Paper detail

Decay for solutions of the wave equation on Kerr exterior spacetimes I-II: The cases |a| << M or axisymmetry

This paper contains the first two parts (I-II) of a three-part series concerning the scalar wave equation \Box_gψ = 0 on a fixed Kerr background. We here restrict to two cases: (II1) |a| \ll M, general ψ or (II2) |a| < M, ψ axisymmetric. In either case, we prove a version of 'integrated local energy decay', specifically, that the 4-integral of an energy-type density (degenerating in a neighborhood of the Schwarzschild photon sphere and at infinity), integrated over the domain of dependence of a spacelike hypersurface Σ connecting the future event horizon with spacelike infinity or a sphere on null infinity, is bounded by a natural (non-degenerate) energy flux of ψ through Σ. (The case (II1) has in fact been treated previously in our Clay Lecture notes: Lectures on black holes and linear waves, arXiv:0811.0354.) In our forthcoming Part III, the restriction to axisymmetry for the general |a| < M case is removed. The complete proof is surveyed in our companion paper The black hole stability problem for linear scalar perturbations, which includes the essential details of our forthcoming Part III. Together with previous work (see our: A new physical-space approach to decay for the wave equation with applications to black hole spacetimes, in XVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, Pavel Exner ed., Prague 2009 pp. 421-433, 2009, arxiv:0910.4957), this result leads, under suitable assumptions on initial data of ψ, to polynomial decay bounds for the energy flux of ψ through the foliation of the black hole exterior defined by the time translates of a spacelike hypersurface Σ terminating on null infinity, as well as to pointwise decay estimates, of a definitive form useful for nonlinear applications.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.