Paper detail

Decadal Variability Survey in MACSJ1149

We present a long temporal baseline variability survey in the Frontier Field MACSJ1149. In this study, we identify active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and other transient sources via their variability using over a decade of Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images for thousands of galaxies in the cluster region and detect significant variability in galaxies extending down to an apparent nuclear magnitude of m$_{i}$ $<$ 26.5. Our analysis utilizes HST images obtained in six different wavelengths from 435 nm to 1.6 microns and covers time scales 12 hours to 12 years apart. We find that $\sim$2% of galaxies in these images are variable with 49 AGN candidates and 4 new supernovae candidates detected. Half of the variables are in the cluster and these are primarily elliptical galaxies displaying variability only in the near-infrared bands. About 20% of the AGN candidates have morphologies and colors consistent with quasars, though most of the variables appear to be dominated by the host galaxy light. The structure function for these sources show a greater amplitude of variability at shorter wavelengths with slopes shallower than typical quasars. We also report a previously unknown Einstein cross identified in this field.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.