Paper detail

De Finetti's theorem: rate of convergence in Kolmogorov distance

This paper provides a quantitative version of de Finetti law of large numbers. Given an infinite sequence $\{X_n\}_{n \geq 1}$ of exchangeable Bernoulli variables, it is well-known that $\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n X_i \stackrel{a.s.}{\longrightarrow} Y$, for a suitable random variable $Y$ taking values in $[0,1]$. Here, we consider the rate of convergence in law of $\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n X_i$ towards $Y$, with respect to the Kolmogorov distance. After showing that any rate of the type of $1/n^α$ can be obtained for any $α\in (0,1]$, we find a sufficient condition on the probability distribution of $Y$ for the achievement of the optimal rate of convergence, that is $1/n$. Our main result improve on existing literature: in particular, with respect to \cite{MPS}, we study a stronger metric while, with respect to \cite{Mna}, we weaken the regularity hypothesis on the probability distribution of $Y$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.