Paper detail

Data-driven turbulence modeling in separated flows considering physical mechanism analysis

Accurate simulation of turbulent flow with separation is an important but challenging problem. In this paper, a data-driven Reynolds-averaged turbulence modeling approach, field inversion and machine learning is implemented to modify the Spalart-Allmaras model separately on three cases, namely, the S809 airfoil, a periodic hill and the GLC305 airfoil with ice shape 944. Field inversion based on a discrete adjoint method is used to quantify the model-form uncertainty with limited experimental data. An artificial neural network is trained to predict the model corrections with local flow features to extract generalized modeling knowledge. Physical knowledge of the nonequilibrium turbulence in the separating shear layer is considered when setting the prior model uncertainty. The results show that the model corrections from the field inversion demonstrate strong consistency with the underlying physical mechanism of nonequilibrium turbulence. The quantity of interest from the observation data can be reproduced with relatively high accuracy by the augmented model. In addition, the validation in similar flow conditions shows a certain extent of generalization ability.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.