Paper detail

Data Driven Modeling of Interfacial Traction Separation Relations using a Thermodynamically Consistent Neural Network

For multilayer structures, interfacial failure is one of the most important elements related to device reliability. For cohesive zone modelling, traction-separation relations represent the adhesive interactions across interfaces. However, existing theoretical models do not currently capture traction-separation relations that have been extracted using direct methods, particularly under mixed-mode conditions. Given the complexity of the problem, models derived from the neural network approach are attractive. Although they can be trained to fit data along the loading paths taken in a particular set of mixed-mode fracture experiments, they may fail to obey physical laws for paths not covered by the training data sets. In this paper, a thermodynamically consistent neural network (TCNN) approach is established to model the constitutive behavior of interfaces when faced with sparse training data sets. Accordingly, three conditions are examined and implemented here: (i) thermodynamic consistency, (ii) maximum energy dissipation path control and (iii) J-integral conservation. These conditions are treated as constraints and are implemented as such in the loss function. The feasibility of this approach is demonstrated by comparing the modeling results with a range of physical constraints. Moreover, a Bayesian optimization algorithm is then adopted to optimize the weight factors associated with each of the constraints in order to overcome convergence issues that can arise when multiple constraints are present. The resultant numerical implementation of the ideas presented here produced well-behaved, mixed-mode traction separation surfaces that maintained the fidelity of the experimental data that was provided as input. The proposed approach heralds a new autonomous, point-to-point constitutive modeling concept for interface mechanics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.