Paper detail

Dark Matter Thermonuclear Supernova Ignition

We investigate local environmental effects from dark matter (DM) on thermonuclear supernovae (SNe Ia) using publicly available archival data of 224 low-redshift events, in an attempt to shed light on the SN Ia progenitor systems. SNe Ia are explosions of carbon-oxygen (CO) white dwarfs (WDs) that have recently been shown to explode at sub-Chandrasekhar masses; the ignition mechanism remains, however, unknown. Recently, it has been shown that both weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) and macroscopic DM candidates such as primordial black holes (PBHs) are capable of triggering the ignition. Here, we present a method to estimate the DM density and velocity dispersion in the vicinity of SN Ia events and nearby WDs; we argue that (i) WIMP ignition is highly unlikely, and that (ii) DM in the form of PBHs distributed according to a (quasi-) log-normal mass distribution with peak $\log_{10}(m_0/1$g$)=24.9\pm 0.9$ and width $σ= 3.3\pm 1.0$ is consistent with SN Ia data, the nearby population of WDs and roughly consistent with other constraints from the literature.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.