Paper detail

Dark matter distribution in galaxy groups from combined strong lensing and dynamics analysis

Using a combined analysis of strong lensing and galaxy dynamics, we characterize the mass distributions and M/L ratios of galaxy groups, which form an important transition regime in Lambda-CDM cosmology. By mapping the underlying mass distribution, we test whether groups are dark matter dominated as hypothesized by the standard cosmogony, or isothermal as observed in baryon rich field galaxies. We present our lensing + galaxy dynamics formalism built around the dark matter dominant NFW and Hernquist distributions, compared against the Isothermal Sphere observed in galaxy scale objects. We show that mass measurement in the core of the group (r ~ 0.2 r_{vir}), determined jointly from a lens model and from differential velocity dispersion estimates, may effectively distinguish between these density distributions. We apply our method to MOS observations of two groups, SL2SJ1430+5546 and SL2SJ1431+5533, drawn from our CFHTLS lens catalog. With the measured lensing and dynamical masses, combined with a maximum likelihood estimator built around our model, we estimate the concentration index characterizing each density distribution and the corresponding virial mass of each group. Our results indicate that both groups are dark matter dominant, and reject the Isothermal distribution at >>3 sigma level. For both groups, the estimated i-band M/L ratios of ~260 Msun/Lsun, are similar to other published values for groups. The Gaussian distributions of the velocities of their member galaxies support a high degree of virialization. The differences in their virial masses, 2.8 and 1.6 x 10^14 Msun, and velocity dispersions, 720 and 560 km/s respectively, may indicate however that each group is at a different stage of transition to a cluster. We aim to populate this important transition regime with additional results from ongoing observations of the remaining lensing groups in our catalog.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.