Paper detail

Dark Matter Annihilation in the light of EGRET, HEAT, WMAP, INTEGRAL and ROSAT

The ROSAT Galactic wind observations confirm that our Galaxy launches supernova driven Galactic winds with wind speeds of about 150 km/s in the Galactic plane. Galactic winds of this strength are incompatible with current isotropic models for Cosmic Ray transport. In order to reproduce our local CRs in the presence of Galactic winds, charged CRs are required to be much more localized than in the standard isotropic GALPROP models. This requires that anisotropic diffusion is the dominant diffusion mode in the interstellar medium, particularly that the diffusion in the disk and in the halo are different. In addition small scale phenomena such as trapping by molecular cloud complexes and the structure of our local environment might influence the secondary CR production rate and our local CR density gradients. We introduce an anisotropic convection driven transport model (aCDM) which is consistent with the Galactic wind observations by ROSAT. This also explains the large bulge/disk ratio as observed by INTEGRAL. Furthermore such models predict an increase in the $e^+/(e^++e^-)$-fraction as observed by PAMELA and HEAT, if the synchrotron constraints in the 408 MHz and WMAP range are taken into account. No additional contribution from Dark Matter is required. The aCDM is able to explain the absence of a positron annihilation signal from molecular clouds as observed by INTEGRAL by virtue of a mechanism which confines and isotropizes CRs between MCs. We find that the EGRET excess of diffuse $γ$-rays currently cannot be explained by astrophysical effects in this type of model and that the interpretation of the EGRET excess as Dark Matter annihilation is perfectly consistent with all observational constraints from local CR fluxes and synchrotron radiation.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.