Paper detail

Dark matter and halo bispectrum in redshift space: theory and applications

We present a phenomenological modification of the standard perturbation theory prediction for the bispectrum in redshift space that allows us to extend the model to mildly non-linear scales over a wide range of redshifts, $z\leq1.5$. We find that we can describe the bispectrum of dark matter particles with $\sim5%$ accuracy for $k_i\lesssim0.10\,h/{\rm Mpc}$ at $z=0$, for $k_i\lesssim0.15\,h/{\rm Mpc}$ at $z=0.5$, for $k_i\lesssim0.17\,h/{\rm Mpc}$ at $z=1.0$ and for $k_i\lesssim0.20\,h/{\rm Mpc}$ at $z=1.5$. We also test that the fitting formula is able to describe with similar accuracy the bispectrum of cosmologies with different $Ω_m$, in the range $0.2\lesssim Ω_m \lesssim 0.4$, and consequently with different values of the logarithmic grow rate $f$ at $z=0$, $0.4\lesssim f(z=0) \lesssim 0.6$. We apply this new formula to recover the bias parameters, $f$ and $σ_8$, by combining the redshift space power spectrum monopole and quadrupole with the bispectrum monopole for both dark matter particles and haloes. We find that the combination of these three statistics can break the degeneracy between $b_1$, $f$ and $σ_8$. For dark matter particles the new model can be used to recover $f$ and $σ_8$ with $\sim1%$ accuracy. For dark matter haloes we find that $f$ and $σ_8$ present larger systematic shifts, $\sim10%$. The systematic offsets arise because of limitations in the modelling of the interplay between bias and redshift space distortions, and represent a limitation as the statistical errors of forthcoming surveys reach this level. Conveniently, we find that these residual systematics are mitigated for combinations of parameters. The improvement on the modelling of the bispectrum presented in this paper will be useful for extracting information from current and future galaxy surveys. [abridged]

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.