Paper detail

Dark fluid or cosmological constant : Why there are different de Sitter-type spacetimes

Many different forms of the de Sitter metric in different coordinate systems are used in the general relativity literature. Two of them are the most common, the static form and the cosmological (exponentially expanding) form. The staticity and non-stationarity of these two different forms are traced back to the noncomoving and comoving nature of the corresponding coordinate systems. In this paper using the quasi-Maxwell form of the Einstein field equations and a definition of static spacetimes based upon them, we look at these two different forms of the same solution from a new perspective which classifies them as a special case in a general one-parameter family of solutions. Specifically it is proved that, {\it irrespective of the spacetime symmetry, a one-element perfect fluid in any frame noncomoving with the fluid could be the source of a static spacetime, only if its equation of state is that of a dark fluid namely $p = -ρ= const.$}. These static solutions, which include the well-known de Sitter spacetime, are called de Sitter-type spacetimes. To exemplify we consider static axially and cylindrically symmetric de Sitter-type spacetimes and their dynamic (cosmological) versions. It is shown how despite the seemingly natural expectation based on the presence of $Λ$ as their only parameter, the nonspherical expansions of these genuinely different solutions should be expected indeed. To the best of our knowledge the dynamic version of the cylindrically symmetric de Sitter-type spacetime is introduced here for the first time. Finally it is noted that the identification of the geometric term $Λg_{ij}$ with a perfect fluid with equation of state $p = -ρ= const.$, although mathematically consistent, obscures the crucial role of the (dark) fluid's velocity in defining a preferred (comoving) coordinate system in de Sitter-type spacetimes.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.