Paper detail

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Modeling Uncertainty

This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter $S_8\equivσ_8\sqrt{Ω_\textrm{m}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $Λ$CDM: $S_8=0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the $Λ$CDM analysis: $S_8=0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak-lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of $Λ$CDM is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower $S_8$ than the CMB-inferred value by $2.3σ$ (a $p$-value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than 0.3$σ$ in the plane of $S_8\timesΩ_\textrm{m}$ caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
L. F. SeccoS. SamuroffE. KrauseB. JainJ. BlazekM. RaveriA. CamposA. AmonA. ChenC. DouxA. ChoiD. GruenG. M. BernsteinC. ChangJ. DeroseJ. MylesA. FertéP. LemosD. HutererJ. PratM. A. TroxelN. MaccrannA. R. LiddleT. KacprzakX. FangC. SánchezS. PandeyS. DodelsonP. ChintalapatiK. HoffmannA. AlarconO. AlvesF. Andrade-OliveiraE. J. BaxterK. BechtolM. R. BeckerA. Brandao-SouzaH. CamachoA. Carnero RosellM. Carrasco KindR. CawthonJ. P. CorderoM. CrocceC. DavisE. Di ValentinoA. Drlica-WagnerK. EckertT. F. EiflerM. ElidaianaF. ElsnerJ. Elvin-PooleS. EverettP. FosalbaO. FriedrichM. GattiG. GianniniR. A. GruendlI. HarrisonW. G. HartleyK. HernerH. HuangE. M. HuffM. JarvisN. JeffreyN. KuropatkinP. -F. LegetJ. MuirJ. McCulloughA. Navarro AlsinaY. OmoriY. ParkA. PorredonR. RollinsA. RoodmanR. RosenfeldA. J. RossE. S. RykoffJ. SanchezI. Sevilla-NoarbeE. S. SheldonT. ShinI. TutusausT. N. VargaN. WeaverdyckR. H. WechslerB. YannyB. YinY. ZhangJ. ZuntzT. M. C. AbbottM. AguenaS. AllamJ. AnnisD. BaconE. BertinS. BhargavaS. L. BridleD. BrooksE. Buckley-GeerD. L. BurkeJ. CarreteroM. CostanziL. N. da CostaJ. De VicenteH. T. DiehlJ. P. DietrichP. DoelI. FerreroB. FlaugherJ. FriemanJ. García-BellidoE. GaztanagaD. W. GerdesT. GiannantonioJ. GschwendG. GutierrezS. R. HintonD. L. HollowoodK. HonscheidB. HoyleD. J. JamesT. JeltemaK. KuehnO. LahavM. LimaH. LinM. A. G. MaiaJ. L. MarshallP. MartiniP. MelchiorF. MenanteauR. MiquelJ. J. MohrR. MorganR. L. C. OgandoA. PalmeseF. Paz-ChinchónD. PetravickA. PieresA. A. Plazas MalagónM. Rodriguez-MonroyA. K. RomerE. SanchezV. ScarpineM. SchubnellD. ScolnicS. SerranoM. SmithM. Soares-SantosE. SuchytaM. E. C. SwansonG. TarleD. ThomasC. To

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access154 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

L. F. SeccoS. SamuroffE. KrauseB. JainJ. BlazekM. RaveriA. CamposA. AmonA. ChenC. DouxA. ChoiD. GruenG. M. BernsteinC. ChangJ. DeroseJ. MylesA. FertéP. LemosD. HutererJ. PratM. A. TroxelN. MaccrannA. R. LiddleT. KacprzakX. FangC. SánchezS. PandeyS. DodelsonP. ChintalapatiK. HoffmannA. AlarconO. AlvesF. Andrade-OliveiraE. J. BaxterK. BechtolM. R. BeckerA. Brandao-SouzaH. CamachoA. Carnero RosellM. Carrasco KindR. CawthonJ. P. CorderoM. CrocceC. DavisE. Di ValentinoA. Drlica-WagnerK. EckertT. F. EiflerM. ElidaianaF. ElsnerJ. Elvin-PooleS. EverettP. FosalbaO. FriedrichM. GattiG. GianniniR. A. GruendlI. HarrisonW. G. HartleyK. HernerH. HuangE. M. HuffM. JarvisN. JeffreyN. KuropatkinP. -F. LegetJ. MuirJ. McCulloughA. Navarro AlsinaY. OmoriY. ParkA. PorredonR. RollinsA. RoodmanR. RosenfeldA. J. RossE. S. RykoffJ. SanchezI. Sevilla-NoarbeE. S. SheldonT. ShinI. TutusausT. N. VargaN. WeaverdyckR. H. WechslerB. YannyB. YinY. ZhangJ. ZuntzT. M. C. AbbottM. AguenaS. AllamJ. AnnisD. BaconE. BertinS. BhargavaS. L. BridleD. BrooksE. Buckley-GeerD. L. BurkeJ. CarreteroM. CostanziL. N. da CostaJ. De VicenteH. T. DiehlJ. P. DietrichP. DoelI. FerreroB. FlaugherJ. FriemanJ. García-BellidoE. GaztanagaD. W. GerdesT. GiannantonioJ. GschwendG. GutierrezS. R. HintonD. L. HollowoodK. HonscheidB. HoyleD. J. JamesT. JeltemaK. KuehnO. LahavM. LimaH. LinM. A. G. MaiaJ. L. MarshallP. MartiniP. MelchiorF. MenanteauR. MiquelJ. J. MohrR. MorganR. L. C. OgandoA. PalmeseF. Paz-ChinchónD. PetravickA. PieresA. A. Plazas MalagónM. Rodriguez-MonroyA. K. RomerE. SanchezV. ScarpineM. SchubnellD. ScolnicS. SerranoM. SmithM. Soares-SantosE. SuchytaM. E. C. SwansonG. TarleD. ThomasC. To

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.