Paper detail

Dark Energy Probes in Light of the CMB

CMB observables have largely fixed the expansion history of the universe in the deceleration regime and provided two self-calibrated absolute standards for dark energy studies: the sound horizon at recombination as a standard ruler and the amplitude of initial density fluctuations. We review these inferences and expose the testable assumptions about recombination and reionization that underly them. Fixing the deceleration regime with CMB observables, deviations in the distance and growth observables appear most strongly at z=0 implying that accurate calibration of local and CMB standards may be more important than redshift range or depth. The single most important complement to the CMB for measuring the dark energy equation of state at z~0.5 is a determination of the Hubble constant to better than a few percent. Counterintuitively, with fixed fractional distance errors and relative standards such as SNe, the Hubble constant measurement is best achieved in the high redshift deceleration regime. Degeneracies between the evolution and current value of the equation of state or between its value and spatial curvature can be broken if percent level measurement and calibration of distance standards can be made at intermediate redshifts or the growth function at any redshift in the acceleration regime. We compare several dark energy probes available to a wide and deep optical survey: baryon features in galaxy angular power spectra and the growth rate from galaxy-galaxy lensing, shear tomography and the cluster abundance.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.