Paper detail

Dark Baryogenesis

We first suggested a scenario in which a generic, dark chiral gauge group undergoes a first order phase transition in order to generate the observed baryon asymmetry in the universe, provide a viable dark matter candidate and explain the observed baryon-to-dark matter ratio of relic abundances [arXiv:1003.0899]. We now provide a model in which a copy of the electroweak gauge group is added to the Standard Model. We spontaneously break this new gauge group to the diagonal Z_2 center which is used to stabilize a dark matter candidate. In addition to the dark matter candidate, anomaly free messenger fermions are included which transform non-trivially under all the gauge groups. In analogy to electroweak baryogenesis, the model generates an excess of messenger "baryons". These "baryons" subsequently decay to the Standard Model and dark matter to generate an excess of Standard Model baryons. The baryon-to-dark matter number density ratio is ultimately due to the requirement of gauge anomaly freedom. Dark sphalerons generate operators which violate B - L but preserves B + L. Thus, the asymmetry is not washed out by the Standard Model. The model radiatively generates a dark matter mass of order of the electroweak vacuum expectation value suppressed by a loop factor therefore setting the dark matter-to-baryon relic abundance. We outline some distinctive experimental signatures and ensure these models are consistent with existing constraints. As first discussed in [arXiv:0907.3142], these dark matter scenarios feature long-lived particles which can be observed at colliders. We finally show how approximate global symmetries in the higgs sector stabilize both the dark and electroweak scales thereby mitigating the hierarchy problem. Light dark higgses are needed to ensure the correct relic abundance. Thus, by construction the SM and dark higgses generate masses at two- and three-loops, respectively.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.