Paper detail

Dark and luminous mass components of Omega Centauri with stellar kinematics

We combine proper motion data from $Gaia$ EDR3 and HST with line-of-sight velocity data to study the stellar kinematics of the Omega Centauri globular cluster. Using a steady-state, axisymmetric dynamical model, we measure the distribution of both the dark and luminous mass components. Assuming both Gaussian and NFW mass profiles, depending on the dataset, we measure an integrated mass of $\lesssim 10^6$ M$_\odot$ within the Omega Centauri half-light radius for a dark component that is distinct from the luminous stellar component. For the HST and radial velocity data, models with a non-luminous mass component are strongly statistically preferred relative to a stellar mass-only model with a constant mass-to-light ratio. While a compact core of stellar remnants may account for a dynamical mass up to $\sim 5 \times 10^5$ M$_\odot$, they likely cannot explain the higher end of the range. This leaves open the possibility that this non-luminous dynamical mass component is comprised of non-baryonic dark matter. In comparison to the dark matter distributions around dwarf spheroidal galaxies, the Omega Centauri dark mass component is much more centrally concentrated. Interpreting the non-luminous mass distribution as particle dark matter, we use these results to obtain the J-factor, which sets the sensitivity to the annihilation cross section. For the datasets considered, the range of median J-factors is $\sim 10^{22} - 10^{24}$ GeV$^2$ cm$^{-5}$, which is larger than that obtained for any dwarf spheroidal galaxy.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.