Paper detail

DAG-width is PSPACE-complete

Berwanger et al. show that for every graph $G$ of size $n$ and DAG-width $k$ there is a DAG decomposition of width $k$ and size $n^{O(k)}$. This gives a polynomial time algorithm for determining the DAG-width of a graph for any fixed $k$. However, if the DAG-width of the graphs from a class is not bounded, such algorithms become exponential. This raises the question whether we can always find a DAG decomposition of size polynomial in $n$ as it is the case for tree width and all generalisations of tree width similar to DAG-width. We show that there is an infinite class of graphs such that every DAG decomposition of optimal width has size super-polynomial in $n$ and, moreover, there is no polynomial size DAG decomposition which would approximate an optimal decomposition up to an additive constant. In the second part we use our construction to prove that deciding whether the DAG-width of a given graph is at most a given constant is PSPACE-complete.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.