Paper detail

Daedalus: Breaking Non-Maximum Suppression in Object Detection via Adversarial Examples

This paper demonstrates that Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), which is commonly used in Object Detection (OD) tasks to filter redundant detection results, is no longer secure. Considering that NMS has been an integral part of OD systems, thwarting the functionality of NMS can result in unexpected or even lethal consequences for such systems. In this paper, an adversarial example attack which triggers malfunctioning of NMS in end-to-end OD models is proposed. The attack, namely \texttt{Daedalus}, compresses the dimensions of detection boxes to evade NMS. As a result, the final detection output contains extremely dense false positives. This can be fatal for many OD applications such as autonomous vehicles and surveillance systems. The attack can be generalised to different end-to-end OD models, such that the attack cripples various OD applications. Furthermore, a way to craft robust adversarial examples is developed by using an ensemble of popular detection models as the substitutes. Considering the pervasive nature of model reusing in real-world OD scenarios, Daedalus examples crafted based on an \textit{ensemble of substitutes} can launch attacks without knowing the parameters of the victim models. Experimental results demonstrate that the attack effectively stops NMS from filtering redundant bounding boxes. As the evaluation results suggest, Daedalus increases the false positive rate in detection results to $99.9\%$ and reduces the mean average precision scores to $0$, while maintaining a low cost of distortion on the original inputs. It is also demonstrated that the attack can be practically launched against real-world OD systems via printed posters.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.