Paper detail

DADF: A Distribution-Aware Debiasing Framework for Watch-Time Regression in Recommender Systems

Watch-time prediction is a central regression task in short-video recommender systems, where labels are highly long-tailed and residual errors vary systematically across observed watch-time regions. In practice, a model may appear globally calibrated while still overestimating short views and underestimating long views, because opposite errors cancel out in aggregate. Existing methods mainly improve the first-stage watch-time predictor, but often leave such residual distributional bias insufficiently corrected. We propose DADF, a distribution-aware debiasing framework for watch-time regression. Instead of replacing a deployed predictor, DADF performs second-stage multiplicative residual correction on top of it. DADF combines three complementary designs: a dynamic distribution-aware transformation for stabilizing long-tailed correction targets, a debias-factor-aware module for modeling heterogeneous residual patterns using inference-time observable factors, especially video duration, and a multi-label-aware module that exploits auxiliary prediction signals from engagement heads. We evaluate DADF on public short-video benchmarks and a large-scale industrial ranking system. DADF consistently improves both pointwise accuracy and ranking quality across datasets and backbones. In the industrial setting, it achieves a 1.88 percentage-point WUAUC gain over the production baseline, reduces MAE by 12.57%, and yields a statistically significant 0.347% lift in average time spent per device in online A/B testing. These results demonstrate that DADF effectively mitigates local calibration bias and provides a practical plug-in solution for debiasing long-tailed continuous targets. The source code is available at https://github.com/liuzhao09/DADF.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.