Paper detail

D-MG Tradeoff of DF and AF Relaying Protocols over Asynchronous PAM Cooperative Networks

The diversity multiplexing tradeoff of a general two-hop asynchronous cooperative network is examined for various relaying protocols such as non-orthogonal selection decode-and-forward (NSDF), orthogonal selection decode-and-forward (OSDF), non-orthogonal amplify-and-forward (NAF), and orthogonal amplify-and-forward (OAF). The transmitter nodes are assumed to send pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) signals asynchronously, in which information symbols are linearly modulated by a shaping waveform to be sent to the destination. We consider two different cases with respect to the length of the shaping waveforms in the time domain. In the theoretical case where the shaping waveforms with infinite time support are used, it is shown that asynchronism does not affect the DMT performance of the system and the same DMT as that of the corresponding synchronous network is obtained for all the aforementioned protocols. In the practical case where finite length shaping waveforms are used, it is shown that better diversity gains can be achieved at the expense of bandwidth expansion. In the decode-and-forward (DF) type protocols, the asynchronous network provides better diversity gains than those of the corresponding synchronous network throughout the range of the multiplexing gain. In the amplify-and-forward (AF) type protocols, the asynchronous network provides the same DMT as that of the corresponding synchronous counterpart under the OAF protocol; however, a better diversity gain is achieved under the NAF protocol throughout the range of the multiplexing gain. In particular, in the single relay asynchronous network, the NAF protocol provides the same DMT as that of the 2 {\times} 1 multiple-input single-output (MISO) channel.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.