Paper detail

D-CFPR: D numbers extended consistent fuzzy preference relations

How to express an expert's or a decision maker's preference for alternatives is an open issue. Consistent fuzzy preference relation (CFPR) is with big advantages to handle this problem due to it can be construed via a smaller number of pairwise comparisons and satisfies additive transitivity property. However, the CFPR is incapable of dealing with the cases involving uncertain and incomplete information. In this paper, a D numbers extended consistent fuzzy preference relation (D-CFPR) is proposed to overcome the weakness. The D-CFPR extends the classical CFPR by using a new model of expressing uncertain information called D numbers. The D-CFPR inherits the merits of classical CFPR and can be totally reduced to the classical CFPR. This study can be integrated into our previous study about D-AHP (D numbers extended AHP) model to provide a systematic solution for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.