Paper detail

D-branes, Supersymmetry Breaking, and Neutrinos

This thesis studies meta- and exactly stable supersymmetry breaking mechanisms in heterotic and type IIB string theories and constructs an F-theory Grand Unified Theory model for neutrino physics in which neutrino mass is determined by the supersymmetry breaking mechanism. Focussing attention on heterotic string theory compactified on a 4-torus, stability of non-supersymmetric states is studied. A non-supersymmetric state with robust stability is constructed, and its exact stability is proven in a large region of moduli space of T^4 against all the possible decay mechanisms allowed by charge conservation. Using string-string duality, the results are interpreted in terms of Dirichlet-branes in type IIA string theory compactified on an orbifold limit of a K3 surface. In type IIB string theory, metastable and exactly stable non-supersymmetric systems are constructed using D-branes and Calabi-Yau geometry. Branes and anti-branes wrap rigid and separate 2-spheres inside a non-compact Calabi-Yau three-fold: supersymmetry is spontaneously broken. These metastable vacua are analyzed in a holographic dual picture on a complex-deformed CY3 where 2-spheres have been replaced by 3-spheres with flux through them. By computing bosonic masses, we identify location and mode of instability. The moduli space of this complex-deformed CY3 is studied, and methods for studying the global phase structure of supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric flux vacua are proposed. By turning on a varying Neveu-Schwarz flux inside the CY3, we build meta- and exactly stable non-supersymmetric configurations with D-branes but with no anti-D-branes. Finally, a scenario for Dirac neutrinos in an F-theory SU(5) GUT model is proposed. Supersymmetry breaking leads to an F-term for Higgs field which induces a Dirac mass. A mild normal hierarchy and large mixing angles are predicted.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.