Paper detail

D^0 - D^0-bar Oscillations as a Probe of Quark-Hadron Duality

It is usually argued that the Standard Model predicts slow D^0-\bar D^0 oscillations with ΔM_D, ΔΓ_D < 10^{-3}*Γ_D$ and that New Physics can reveal itself through ΔM_D exceeding 10^{-3}*Γ_D. It is believed that the bulk of the effect is due to long distance dynamics that cannot be described at the quark level. We point out that in general the OPE yields soft GIM suppression scaling only like (m_s/μ_{hadr})^2 and even like m_s/μ_{hadr} rather than m_s^4/m_c^4 of the simple quark box diagram. Such contributions can actually yield ΔM_D, ΔΓ_D \sim O(10^{-3})*Γ_D without invoking additional long distance effects. They are reasonably suppressed as long as the OPE and local duality are qualitatively applicable in the 1/m_c expansion. We stress the importance of improving the sensitivity on ΔΓ_D as well as ΔM_D in a dedicated fashion as a laboratory for analyzing the onset of quark-hadron duality and comment on the recent preliminary study on ΔΓ_D by the FOCUS group.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.