Paper detail

CYCLOPS-X: Simultaneous optical and X-ray modeling of polars

From the optical to the X-ray frequencies, most of the continuum emission from AM Her systems originates in the post-shock region. Hence, using multi-spectral data can be useful to restrict the physical and geometrical properties of that region. In spite of that, distinct codes are used to model these frequency ranges. CYCLOPS is a code to model the optical cyclotron emission of polars. In this contribution, we present the first version of CYCLOPS-X, an improvement of CYCLOPS to fit simultaneously optical and X-ray data. The new code adds the bremsstrahlung as an emission process as well as the effects of X-ray absorption by the upper portion of the accretion column. As a first application of CYCLOPS-X, we present X-ray light curves using two sets of parameters provided by the optical modeling of CP Tuc. These two cases have very similar optical emission, but quite distinct light-curves in high energies. It illustrates the need of simultaneous modeling of the optical and X-ray emission to a proper description of the magnetic accretion in polars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.