Paper detail

Cyclists Cardiac Conundrum

Arrhythmia is an abnormality of the heart's rhythm, caused by problems in the conductive system and resulting in irregular heartbeats. There is increasing evidence that undertaking frequent endurance sports training elevates one's risk of arrhythmia. Arrhythmia is diagnosed using an electrocardiogram (ECG) but this is not typically available to athletes while exercising. Previous research by Crickles investigates the usefulness of commonly available heart rate data in detecting signs of arrhythmia. It is hypothesised that a feature termed 'gappiness', defined by jumps in the heart rate while the athlete is under exertion, may be a characteristic of arrhythmia. A correlation was found between the proportion of 'gappy' activities and survey responses about heart rhythm problems. We develop on this measure by exploring various methods to detect spikes in heart rate data, allowing us to describe the extent of irregularity in an activity via the rate of spikes. We first compare the performance of these methods on simulated data, where we find that smoothing using a moving average and setting a constant threshold on the residuals is most effective. This method was then implemented on real data provided by Crickles from 168 athletes, where no significant correlation was found between the spike rates and survey responses. However, when considering only those spikes that occur above a heart rate of 160 beats per minute (bpm) a significant correlation was found. This supports the hypothesis that jumps at only high heart rates are informative of arrhythmia and indicates the need for further research into better measures to characterise features of heart rate data.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.