Paper detail

Cyclic Redundancy Checks and Error Detection

This study investigates the capabilities of Cyclic Redundancy Checks(CRCs) to detect burst and random errors. Researchers have favored these error detection codes throughout the evolution of computing and have implemented them in communication protocols worldwide. CRCs are integrated into almost every device, in software and hardware. CRCs play a critical role in ensuring that our digital communication systems are efficient and erroneous packets are detected. Because the quantity of data generated and transmitted has increased over the last twenty years, we are more likely to encounter errors. It is important that the tools and methodologies used to ensure the integrity of digital communication systems are evaluated to handle higher frequencies of information. In this study, we explore the need to improve the capabilities of error-detecting codes to handle higher quantities of data by testing the error detection properties of CRC's in a restricted domain.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.