Paper detail

Cyclic motions in Dekel-Scotchmer Game Experiments

TASP (Time Average Shapley Polygon, Bena{\=ı}m, Hofbauer and Hopkins, \emph{Journal of Economic Theory}, 2009), as a novel evolutionary dynamics model, predicts that a game could converge to cycles instead of fix points (Nash equilibria). To verify TASP theory, using the four strategy Dekel-Scotchmer games (Dekel and Scotchmer, \emph{Journal of Economic Theory}, 1992), four experiments were conducted (Cason, Friedman and Hopkins, \emph{Journal of Economic Theory}, 2010), in which, however, reported no evidence of cycles (Cason, Friedman and Hopkins, \emph{The Review of Economic Studies}, 2013). We reanalysis the four experiment data by testing the stochastic averaging of angular momentum in period-by-period transitions of the social state. We find, the existence of persistent cycles in Dekel-Scotchmer game can be confirmed. On the cycles, the predictions from evolutionary models had been supported by the four experiments.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.