Paper detail

Cycle lengths in randomly perturbed graphs

Let $G$ be an $n$-vertex graph, where $δ(G) \geq δn$ for some $δ:= δ(n)$. A result of Bohman, Frieze and Martin from 2003 asserts that if $α(G) = O \left(δ^2 n \right)$, then perturbing $G$ via the addition of $ω\left(\frac{\log(1/δ)}{δ^3} \right)$ random edges, asymptotically almost surely (a.a.s. hereafter) results in a Hamiltonian graph. This bound on the size of the random perturbation is only tight when $δ$ is independent of $n$ and deteriorates as to become uninformative when $δ= Ω\left(n^{-1/3} \right)$. We prove several improvements and extensions of the aforementioned result. First, keeping the bound on $α(G)$ as above and allowing for $δ= Ω(n^{-1/3})$, we determine the correct order of magnitude of the number of random edges whose addition to $G$ a.a.s. results in a pancyclic graph. Our second result ventures into significantly sparser graphs $G$; it delivers an almost tight bound on the size of the random perturbation required to ensure pancyclicity a.a.s., assuming $δ(G) = Ω\left((α(G) \log n)^2 \right)$ and $α(G) δ(G) = O(n)$. Assuming the correctness of Chvátal's toughness conjecture, allows for the mitigation of the condition $α(G) = O \left(δ^2 n \right)$ imposed above, by requiring $α(G) = O(δ(G))$ instead; our third result determines, for a wide range of values of $δ(G)$, the correct order of magnitude of the size of the random perturbation required to ensure the a.a.s. pancyclicity of $G$. For the emergence of nearly spanning cycles, our fourth result determines, under milder conditions, the correct order of magnitude of the size of the random perturbation required to ensure that a.a.s. $G$ contains such a cycle.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.