Paper detail

Cycle lengths and minimum degree of graphs

There has been extensive research on cycle lengths in graphs with large minimum degree. In this paper, we obtain several new and tight results in this area. Let $G$ be a graph with minimum degree at least $k+1$. We prove that if $G$ is bipartite, then there are $k$ cycles in $G$ whose lengths form an arithmetic progression with common difference two. For general graph $G$, we show that $G$ contains $\lfloor k/2\rfloor$ cycles with consecutive even lengths and $k-3$ cycles whose lengths form an arithmetic progression with common difference one or two. In addition, if $G$ is 2-connected and non-bipartite, then $G$ contains $\lfloor k/2\rfloor$ cycles with consecutive odd lengths. Thomassen (1983) made two conjectures on cycle lengths modulo a fixed integer $k$: (1) every graph with minimum degree at least $k+1$ contains cycles of all even lengths modulo $k$; (2) every 2-connected non-bipartite graph with minimum degree at least $k+1$ contains cycles of all lengths modulo $k$. These two conjectures, if true, are best possible. Our results confirm both conjectures when $k$ is even. And when $k$ is odd, we show that minimum degree at least $k+4$ suffices. This improves all previous results in this direction. Moreover, our results derive new upper bounds of the chromatic number in terms of the longest sequence of cycles with consecutive (even or odd) lengths.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.