Paper detail

Cusp Summations and Cusp Relations of Simple Quad Lenses

We review five often used quad lens models, each of which has analytical solutions and can produce four images at most. Each lens model has two parameters, including one that describes the intensity of non-dimensional mass density, and the other one that describes the deviation from the circular lens. In our recent work, we have found that the cusp and the fold summations are not equal to 0, when a point source infinitely approaches a cusp or a fold from inner side of the caustic. Based on the magnification invariant theory, which states that the sum of signed magnifications of the total images of a given source is a constant, we calculate the cusp summations for the five lens models. We find that the cusp summations are always larger than 0 for source on the major cusps, while can be larger or smaller than 0 for source on the minor cusps. We also find that if these lenses tend to the circular lens, the major and minor cusp summations will have infinite values, and with positive and negative signs respectively. The cusp summations do not change significantly if the sources are slightly deviated from the cusps. In addition, through the magnification invariants, we also derive the analytical signed cusp relations on the axes for three lens models. We find that both on the major and the minor axes the larger the lenses deviated from the circular lens, the larger the signed cusp relations. The major cusp relations are usually larger than the absolute minor cusp relations, but for some lens models with very large deviation from circular lens, the minor cusp relations can be larger than the major cusp relations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.