Paper detail

Curvature Singularity in the Asymmetric Breakup of an Underwater Air Bubble

The presence of slight azimuthal asymmetry in the initial shape of an underwater bubble entirely alters the final breakup dynamics. Here I examine the influence of initial asymmetry on the final breakup by simulating the bubble surface evolution as a Hamiltonian evolution corresponding to an inviscid, two-dimensional, planar implosion. I find two types of breakups: a previously reported coalescence mode in which distant regions along the air-water surface curve inwards and eventually collide with finite speed, and a hitherto unknown cusp-like mode in which the surface develops sharp tips whose radii of curvature are much smaller than the average neck radius. I present three sets of results that characterize the nature of this cusp mode. First, I show that the cusp mode corresponds to a saddle-node. In other words, an evolution towards a cross-section shape with sharp tips invariably later evolves away from it. In phase space, this saddle-node separates coalescence modes whose coalescence planes lie along different spatial orientations. Second, I show that the formation of the sharp tips can be interpreted as a weakly first-order transition which becomes second-order, corresponding to the formation of a finite-time curvature singularity, in the limit that the initial perturbation amplitude approaches zero. Third I show that, as the curvature singularity is approached, the maximum surface curvature diverges approximately as $(t_c - t)^{-0.8}$, where $t_c$ is the onset time of the singularity and the maximum velocity diverges approximately as $(t_c-t)^{-0.4}$. In practice, these divergences imply that viscous drag and compressibility of the gas flow, two effects not included in my analysis, become significant as the interface evolves towards the curvature singularity.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.