Paper detail

Current Status of Numerical-Relativity Simulations in Kyoto

We describe the current status of our numerical simulations for the collapse of a massive stellar core to a BH and the BNS mergers, performed in the framework of full general relativity incorporating finite-temperature EOS and neutrino cooling. For the stellar core collapse simulation, we present the latest numerical results. We employed a purely nucleonic EOS (Shen-EOS). As an initial condition, we adopted a 100 $M_{\odot}$ presupernova model calculated by Umeda and Nomoto. Changing the degree of rotation for the initial condition, we clarify the strong dependence of the outcome of the collapse on this. When the rotation is rapid enough, the shock wave formed at the core bounce is deformed to be a torus-like shape. Then, the infalling matter is accumulated in the central region due to the oblique shock at the torus surface, hitting the PNS and dissipating the kinetic energy there. As a result, outflows can be launched. The PNS eventually collapses to a BH and an accretion torus is formed around it. We also found that the evolution of the BH and torus depends strongly on the rotation initially given. In the BNS merger simulations, we in addition employ an EOS incorporating a degree of freedom for hyperons. The numerical simulations show that for the purely nucleonic EOS, a HMNS with a long lifetime ($\gg 10$ ms) is the outcome for the total mass $M \lesssim 3.0M_{\odot}$. By contrast, the formed HMNS collapses to a BH in a shorter time scale with the hyperonic EOS for $M \gtrsim 2.7M_{\odot}$. It is shown that the typical total neutrino luminosity of the HMNS is $\sim 3$--$10\times 10^{53}$ ergs/s and the effective amplitude of gravitational waves from the HMNS is 2--$6 \times 10^{-22}$ at $f\approx 2$--2.5 kHz for a source distance of 100 Mpc.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.