Paper detail

CUED_speech at TREC 2020 Podcast Summarisation Track

In this paper, we describe our approach for the Podcast Summarisation challenge in TREC 2020. Given a podcast episode with its transcription, the goal is to generate a summary that captures the most important information in the content. Our approach consists of two steps: (1) Filtering redundant or less informative sentences in the transcription using the attention of a hierarchical model; (2) Applying a state-of-the-art text summarisation system (BART) fine-tuned on the Podcast data using a sequence-level reward function. Furthermore, we perform ensembles of three and nine models for our submission runs. We also fine-tune the BART model on the Podcast data as our baseline. The human evaluation by NIST shows that our best submission achieves 1.777 in the EGFB scale, while the score of creator-provided description is 1.291. Our system won the Spotify Podcast Summarisation Challenge in the TREC2020 Podcast Track in both human and automatic evaluation.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.