Paper detail

Cubic factor-invariant graphs of cycle quotient type -- the alternating case

We investigate connected cubic vertex-transitive graphs whose edge sets admit a partition into a $2$-factor $\mathcal{C}$ and a $1$-factor that is invariant under a vertex-transitive subgroup of the automorphism group of the graph and where the quotient graph with respect to $\mathcal{C}$ is a cycle. There are two essentially different types of such cubic graphs. In this paper we focus on the examples of what we call the alternating type. We classify all such examples admitting a vertex-transitive subgroup of the automorphism group of the graph preserving the corresponding $2$-factor and also determine the ones for which the $2$-factor is invariant under the full automorphism group of the graph. In this way we introduce a new infinite family of cubic vertex-transitive graphs that is a natural generalization of the well-known generalized Petersen graphs as well as of the honeycomb toroidal graphs. The family contains an infinite subfamily of arc-regular examples and an infinite family of $2$-arc-regular examples.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.