Paper detail

Crystalline symmetry and the melt-growth kinetics of solid-liquid interface

One of the important factors governing the growth morphology of materials is the interface kinetic coefficient μ, which is the proportionality constant between the velocity of solid-liquid interface and undercooling. We employ Ginzburg-Landau (GL) free energy functional to derive an analytical expression of kinetic coefficients. The anisotropy of kinetic coefficients naturally arise from the broken symmetry at the solid-liquid interface for various crystalline orientations. The analytical expression of kinetic coefficients is compared to Mikheev-Chernov theory [J. Cryst. Growth 112, 591 (1991)] derived from hydrodynamic equations. In addition, we use equilibrium density wave profiles to evaluate kinetic coefficients and compare them with that from MD simulations. Our results are in good agreement with Mikheev-Chernov theory and MD simulations and shed lights on a possible origin of anisotropy of interfacial kinetics.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.