Paper detail

Crystal nucleation of hard spheres using molecular dynamics, umbrella sampling and forward flux sampling: A comparison of simulation techniques

Over the last number of years several simulation methods have been introduced to study rare events such as nucleation. In this paper we examine the crystal nucleation rate of hard spheres using three such numerical techniques: molecular dynamics, forward flux sampling and a Bennett-Chandler type theory where the nucleation barrier is determined using umbrella sampling simulations. The resulting nucleation rates are compared with the experimental rates of Harland and Van Megen [J. L. Harland and W. van Megen, Phys. Rev. E 55, 3054 (1997)], Sinn et al. [C. Sinn et al., Prog. Colloid Polym. Sci. 118, 266 (2001)] and Schatzel and Ackerson [K. Schatzel and B.J. Ackerson, Phys. Rev. E, 48, 3766 (1993)] and the predicted rates for monodisperse and 5% polydisperse hard spheres of Auer and Frenkel [S. Auer and D. Frenkel, Nature 409, 1020 (2001)]. When the rates are examined in long-time diffusion units, we find agreement between all the theoretically predicted nucleation rates, however, the experimental results display a markedly different behaviour for low supersaturation. Additionally, we examined the pre-critical nuclei arising in the molecular dynamics, forward flux sampling, and umbrella sampling simulations. The structure of the nuclei appear independent of the simulation method, and in all cases, the nuclei contain on average significantly more face-centered-cubic ordered particles than hexagonal-close-packed ordered particles.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.