Paper detail

Cryopreservation of seeds of blue waterlily (Nymphaea caerulea) using glutathione adding plant vitrification solution, PVS+

Nymphaea caerulea is a valuable freshwater aquatic plant, not only because of its ornamental value but also its extractions for chemical and medical uses. It is necessary to store its seeds as backup resources. Cryopreservation is the reliable, cost-effective method for long-term preservation of botanical genetic banks, especially for recalcitrant plants. In this study, we demonstrated that due to unable to tolerate desiccation and low-temperature, N. caerulea is recalcitrant. Since viability was lost before 6 months storage, N. caerulea seeds were not appropriate to long-term store by traditional storage method. The only way to long-term store N. caerulea seeds is cryopreservation. However, Plant Vitrification Solution 3 (PVS3; 50% w/v sucrose, 50% w/v glycerol), a commonly used plant vitrification solution, was ineffective on N. caerulea seeds cryopreservation. The maximum survival rate of cryopreserved seeds treated by PVS3 was only 23%. Oxidative stress induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation within seeds was the reason to cause inefficiency of PVS3 treated seeds cryopreservation. We developed a new plant vitrification solution (PVS+), by adding glutathione (GSH) into PVS3. PVS+ rescued the inefficiency by decreasing ROS accumulation and elevated survival rate of cryopreserved seeds to 97%. Our results showed some inefficiencies of plant tissue cryopreservation may be caused by ROS-induced oxidative stress. Antioxidants can reduce ROS-induced oxidative stress and improve seeds survival after cryopreservation. In conclusion, N. caerulea seeds were identified as recalcitrant and successfully cryopreserved. Suppressing ROS accumulation during cryopreservation may be a potential strategy to improve survival rate of recalcitrant seeds after cryopreservation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.