Paper detail

Crucial words for abelian powers

A word is &#34;crucial&#34; with respect to a given set of &#34;prohibited words&#34; (or simply &#34;prohibitions&#34;) if it avoids the prohibitions but it cannot be extended to the right by any letter of its alphabet without creating a prohibition. A &#34;minimal crucial word&#34; is a crucial word of the shortest length. A word W contains an &#34;abelian k-th power&#34; if W has a factor of the form X_1X_2...X_k where X_i is a permutation of X_1 for 2<= i <= k. When k=2 or 3, one deals with &#34;abelian squares&#34; and &#34;abelian cubes&#34;, respectively. In 2004 (arXiv:math/0205217), Evdokimov and Kitaev showed that a minimal crucial word over an n-letter alphabet A_n = {1,2,..., n} avoiding abelian squares has length 4n-7 for n >= 3. In this paper we show that a minimal crucial word over A_n avoiding abelian cubes has length 9n-13 for n >= 5, and it has length 2, 5, 11, and 20 for n=1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Moreover, for n >= 4 and k >= 2, we give a construction of length k^2(n-1)-k-1 of a crucial word over A_n avoiding abelian k-th powers. This construction gives the minimal length for k=2 and k=3. For k >= 4 and n >= 5, we provide a lower bound for the length of crucial words over A_n avoiding abelian k-th powers.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.