Paper detail

Crucial effect of glass processing and melt homogenization on the fragility of non-stoichiometric chalcogenides

The kinetics of homogenization of binary As$_x$Se$_{100-x}$ melts in the As concentration range $0\%$ $<$ $x$ $<$ $50\%$ are followed in FT-Raman profiling experiments, and show that 2 gram sized melts in the middle concentration range $20\%$ $<$ $x$ $<$ $30\%$ take nearly two weeks to homogenize when starting materials are reacted at 700$^o$C. In glasses of proven homogeneity, we find molar volumes to vary non-monotonically with composition, and the fragility index ${\cal M}$ displays a broad global minimum in the $20\%$ $<$ $x$ $<$ $30\%$ range of $x$ wherein ${\cal M}<$ 20. We show that properly homogenized samples have a lower measured fragility when compared to larger under-reacted melts. The enthalpy of relaxation at T$_g$, $Δ$H$_{nr}$($x$) shows a minimum in the $27\%$ $<$ $x$ $<$ $37\%$ range. The super-strong nature of melt compositions in the $20\%$ $<$ $x$ $<$ $30\%$ range suppresses melt diffusion at high temperatures leading to the slow kinetics of melt homogenization.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.