Paper detail

CrossRectify: Leveraging Disagreement for Semi-supervised Object Detection

Semi-supervised object detection has recently achieved substantial progress. As a mainstream solution, the self-labeling-based methods train the detector on both labeled data and unlabeled data with pseudo labels predicted by the detector itself, but their performances are always limited. Through experimental analysis, we reveal the underlying reason is that the detector is misguided by the incorrect pseudo labels predicted by itself (dubbed self-errors). These self-errors can hurt performance even worse than random-errors, and can be neither discerned nor rectified during the self-labeling process. In this paper, we propose an effective detection framework named CrossRectify, to obtain accurate pseudo labels by simultaneously training two detectors with different initial parameters. Specifically, the proposed approach leverages the disagreements between detectors to discern the self-errors and refines the pseudo label quality by the proposed cross-rectifying mechanism. Extensive experiments show that CrossRectify achieves outperforming performances over various detector structures on 2D and 3D detection benchmarks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.