Paper detail

Crossover times in bipartite networks with activity constraints and time-varying switching rates

In this paper we study the performance of a bipartite network in which customers arrive at the nodes of the network, but not all nodes are able to serve their customers at all times. Each node can be either active or inactive, and two nodes connected by a bond cannot be active simultaneously. This situation arises in wireless random-access networks where, due to destructive interference, stations that are close to each other cannot use the same frequency band. We consider a model where the network is bipartite, the active nodes switch themselves off at rate 1, and the inactive nodes switch themselves on at a rate that depends on time and on which half of the bipartite network they are in. An inactive node cannot become active when one of the nodes it is connected to by a bond is active. The switching protocol allows the nodes to share activity among each other. In the limit as the activation rate becomes large, we compute the crossover time between the two states where one half of the network is active and the other half is inactive. This allows us to assess the overall activity of the network depending on the switching protocol. Our results make use of the metastability analysis for hard-core interacting particle models on finite bipartite graphs derived in an earlier paper. They are valid for a large class of bipartite networks, subject to certain assumptions. Proofs rely on a comparison with switching protocols that are not time-varying, through coupling techniques.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.