Paper detail

Crossing phantom divide in $f(Q)$ gravity

We investigate the possibility of crossing a phantom divide line in the extension of symmetric teleparallel gravity or the $f(Q)$ gravity, where $Q$ is the non-metricity. We study the cosmic evolution of the effective equation of state parameter for dark energy considering exponential, logarithmic, and combined $f(Q)$ theories. Moreover, the exponential model behaves like the $Λ$CDM at high redshifts before deviating to $ω_{eff}<-1$ or $ω_{eff}>-1$, respectively, depending on the value of model parameter. It also approaches a de-sitter phase asymptotically. However, the crossing of the phantom divide line, i.e., $ω= -1$, is realized in the combined $f(Q)$ theory. Furthermore, statefinder diagnostics are studied in order to differentiate between several dark energy models. To ensure the three model&#39;s stability, we employ the stability analysis using linear perturbations. We demonstrate how to reassemble $f(Q)$ via a numerical inversion approach based on existing observational constraints on cosmographic parameters and the potential of bridging the phantom divide in the resulting model. It explicitly demonstrates that future crossings of the phantom dividing line are a generic feature of feasible $f(Q)$ gravity models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.