Paper detail

Cross Section Uncertainties in the Gallium Neutrino Source Experiments

The 51Cr neutrino source experiments play a unique role in testing overall operations of the GALLEX and SAGE solar neutrino experiments. Recently Hata and Haxton argued that the excited-state contribution to the 71Ga cross section for 51Cr neutrino absorption might not be known reliably, despite forward-angle (p,n) measurements. A large-basis shell model calculation reported here indicates that the unusual situation they envisioned - destructive interference between weak spin and strong spin-tensor amplitudes - does occur for the transition to the first excited state in 71Ge. The calculation provides a counterexample to procedures previously used to determine the 51Cr cross section: the predicted (p,n) cross section for this state agrees with experiment, while the BGT value is well outside the accepted 3-standard-deviation limit. The results argue for a shift in the interpretation of the source experiments: they become more crucial as measurements of the 71Ga detector response to 7Be solar neutrinos, and less definitive as wholly independent tests of 71Ge recovery and counting efficiencies.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.