Paper detail

Cross-matching DENIS and 2MASS Point Sources towards the Magellanic Clouds

The recent publications of the DENIS Catalogue towards the Magellanic Clouds (MCs) with more than 1.3 million sources identified in at least two of the three DENIS filters (I J K_s) and of the incremental releases of the 2MASS point source catalogues (J H K_s) covering the same region of the sky, provide an unprecedented wealth of data related to stellar populations in the MCs. In order to build a reference catalogue of stars towards the Magellanic Clouds, we have performed a cross-identification of these two catalogues. This implied developing new tools for cross-identification and data mining. This study is partly supported by the Astrovirtel program that aims at improving access to astronomical archives as virtual telescopes. The main goal of the present study is to validate new cross-matching procedures for very large catalogues, and to derive results concerning the astrometric and photometric accuracy of these catalogues. The cross-matching of large surveys is an essential tool to improve our understanding of their specific contents. This approach can be considered as a new step towards a Virtual Observatory.

preprint2001arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.