Paper detail

Cross-domain Retrieval in the Legal and Patent Domains: a Reproducibility Study

Domain specific search has always been a challenging information retrieval task due to several challenges such as the domain specific language, the unique task setting, as well as the lack of accessible queries and corresponding relevance judgements. In the last years, pretrained language models, such as BERT, revolutionized web and news search. Naturally, the community aims to adapt these advancements to cross-domain transfer of retrieval models for domain specific search. In the context of legal document retrieval, Shao et al. propose the BERT-PLI framework by modeling the Paragraph Level Interactions with the language model BERT. In this paper we reproduce the original experiments, we clarify pre-processing steps, add missing scripts for framework steps and investigate different evaluation approaches, however we are not able to reproduce the evaluation results. Contrary to the original paper, we demonstrate that the domain specific paragraph-level modelling does not appear to help the performance of the BERT-PLI model compared to paragraph-level modelling with the original BERT. In addition to our legal search reproducibility study, we investigate BERT-PLI for document retrieval in the patent domain. We find that the BERT-PLI model does not yet achieve performance improvements for patent document retrieval compared to the BM25 baseline. Furthermore, we evaluate the BERT-PLI model for cross-domain retrieval between the legal and patent domain on individual components, both on a paragraph and document-level. We find that the transfer of the BERT-PLI model on the paragraph-level leads to comparable results between both domains as well as first promising results for the cross-domain transfer on the document-level. For reproducibility and transparency as well as to benefit the community we make our source code and the trained models publicly available.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.