Paper detail

Crooked Indifferentiability Revisited

In CRYPTO 2018, Russell et al introduced the notion of crooked indifferentiability to analyze the security of a hash function when the underlying primitive is subverted. They showed that the $n$-bit to $n$-bit function implemented using enveloped XOR construction (\textsf{EXor}) with $3n+1$ many $n$-bit functions and $3n^2$-bit random initial vectors (iv) can be proven secure asymptotically in the crooked indifferentiability setting. -We identify several major issues and gaps in the proof by Russel et al, We show that their proof can achieve security only when the adversary is restricted to make queries related to a single message. - We formalize new technique to prove crooked indifferentiability without such restrictions. Our technique can handle function dependent subversion. We apply our technique to provide a revised proof for the \textsf{EXor} construction. - We analyze crooked indifferentiability of the classical sponge construction. We show, using a simple proof idea, the sponge construction is a crooked-indifferentiable hash function using only $n$-bit random iv. This is a quadratic improvement over the {\sf EXor} construction and solves the main open problem of Russel et al.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.