Paper detail

Critically-rotating accretors and non-conservative evolution in Algols

During the mass-transfer phase in Algol systems, a large amount of mass and angular momentum are accreted by the gainer star which can be accelerated up to its critical Keplerian velocity. The fate of the gainer once it reaches this critical value is unclear. We investigate the orbital and stellar spin evolution in semi-detached binary systems, specifically for systems with rapidly rotating accretors. Our aim is to better distinguish between the different spin-down mechanisms proposed which can consistently explain the slow rotation observed in Algols' final states and assess the degree of non-conservatism due to the formation of a hotspot. We use our state-of-the-art binary evolution code, Binstar, which incorporates a detailed treatment of the orbital and stellar spin, including all torques due to mass transfer, the interactions between a star and its accretion disc, tidal effects and magnetic braking. We also present a new prescription for mass loss due to the formation of a hotspot based on energy conservation. The coupling between the star and the disc via the boundary layer prevents the gainer from exceeding the critical rotation. Magnetic-field effects, although operating, are not the dominant spin-down mechanism for sensible field strengths. Spin down owing to tides is 2-4 orders of magnitudes too weak to compensate the spinning-up torque due to mass accretion. Moreover, we find that the final separation strongly depends on the spin-down mechanism. The formation of a hotspot leads to a large event of mass loss during the rapid phase of mass transfer. The degree of conservatism strongly depends on the opacity of the impacted material. A statistical study as well as new observational constraints are needed to find the optimal set of parameters (magnetic-field strength, hotspot geometry,...) to reproduce Algol evolutions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.