Paper detail

Criticality of mostly informative samples: A Bayesian model selection approach

We discuss a Bayesian model selection approach to high dimensional data in the deep under sampling regime. The data is based on a representation of the possible discrete states $s$, as defined by the observer, and it consists of $M$ observations of the state. This approach shows that, for a given sample size $M$, not all states observed in the sample can be distinguished. Rather, only a partition of the sampled states $s$ can be resolved. Such partition defines an {\em emergent} classification $q_s$ of the states that becomes finer and finer as the sample size increases, through a process of {\em symmetry breaking} between states. This allows us to distinguish between the $resolution$ of a given representation of the observer defined states $s$, which is given by the entropy of $s$, and its $relevance$ which is defined by the entropy of the partition $q_s$. Relevance has a non-monotonic dependence on resolution, for a given sample size. In addition, we characterise most relevant samples and we show that they exhibit power law frequency distributions, generally taken as signatures of "criticality". This suggests that "criticality" reflects the relevance of a given representation of the states of a complex system, and does not necessarily require a specific mechanism of self-organisation to a critical point.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.