Paper detail

Critical population and error threshold on the sharp peak landscape for the Wright-Fisher model

We pursue the task of developing a finite population counterpart to Eigen's model. We consider the classical Wright-Fisher model describing the evolution of a population of size $m$ of chromosomes of length $\ell$ over an alphabet of cardinality $κ$. The mutation probability per locus is $q$. The replication rate is $σ>1$ for the master sequence and $1$ for the other sequences. We study the equilibrium distribution of the process in the regime where $\ell\to+\infty$, $m\to+\infty$, $q\to0$, $\ell q\to a\in\,]0,+\infty[$, $\frac{m}{\ell}\toα\in [0,+\infty]$. We obtain an equation $αψ(a)=\lnκ$ in the parameter space $(a,α)$ separating the regime where the equilibrium population is totally random from the regime where a quasispecies is formed. We observe the existence of a critical population size necessary for a quasispecies to emerge, and we recover the finite population counterpart of the error threshold. The result is the twin brother of the corresponding result for the Moran model. The proof is more complex, and it relies on the Freidlin-Wentzell theory of random perturbations of dynamical systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.