Paper detail

Critical Points of Correlated Percolation in a Gravitational Link-adding Network Model

Motivated by the importance of geometric information in real systems, a new model for long-range correlated percolation in link-adding networks is proposed with the connecting probability decaying with a power-law of the distance on the two-dimensional(2D) plane. By overlapping it with Achlioptas process, it serves as a gravity model which can be tuned to facilitate or inhibit the network percolation in a generic view, cover a broad range of thresholds. Moreover, it yields a set of new scaling relations. In the present work, we develop an approach to determine critical points for them by simulating the temporal evolutions of type-I, type-II and type-III links(chosen from both inter-cluster links, an intra-cluster link compared with an inter-cluster one, and both intra-cluster ones, respectively) and corresponding average lengths. Numerical results have revealed objective competition between fractions, average lengths of three types of links, verified the balance happened at critical points. The variation of decay exponents $a$ or transmission radius $R$ always shifts the temporal pace of the evolution, while the steady average lengths and the fractions of links always keep unchanged just as the values in Achlioptas process. Strategy with maximum gravity can keep steady average length, while that with minimum one can surpass it. Without the confinement of transmission range, $\bar{l} \to \infty$ in thermodynamic limit, while $\bar{l}$ does not when with it. However, both mechanisms support critical points. In two-dimensional free space, the relevance of correlated percolation in link-adding process is verified by validation of new scaling relations with various exponent $a$, which violates the scaling law of Weinrib's.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.