Paper detail

Critical Peeling of Tethered Nanoribbons

The peeling of an immobile adsorbed membrane is a well known problem in engineering and macroscopic tribology. In the classic setup, picking up at one extreme and pulling off results in a peeling force that is a decreasing function of the pickup angle. As one end is lifted, the detachment front retracts to meet the immobile tail. At the nanoscale, interesting situations arise with the peeling of graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) on gold, as realized, e.g., by atomic force microscopy. The nanosized system shows a constant-force steady peeling regime, where the tip lifting h produces no retraction of the ribbon detachment point, and just an advancement h of the free tail end. This is opposite to the classic case, where the detachment point retracts and the tail end stands still. Here we characterise, by analytical modeling and numerical simulations, a third, experimentally relevant, setup where the nanoribbon, albeit structurally lubric, does not have a freely moving tail end, which is instead elastically tethered. Surprisingly, novel nontrivial scaling exponents appear that regulate the peeling evolution. As the detachment front retracts and the tethered tail is stretched, power laws of h characterize the shrinking of the adhered length the growth of peeling force and the peeling angle. These exponents precede the final total detachment as a critical point, where the entire ribbon eventually hangs suspended between the tip and tethering spring. These analytical predictions are confirmed by realistic MD simulations, retaining the full atomistic description, also confirming their survival at finite experimental temperatures.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.