Paper detail

Critical Mass Transfer in Double-Degenerate Type Ia Supernovae

Doubly-degenerate binary systems consisting of two white dwarfs both composed of carbon and oxygen and close enough that mass is transferred from the less massive to the more massive are possible progenitors of type Ia supernovae. If the mass transfer rate is slow enough that the accreting white dwarf can reach 1.38 solar masses then it can ignite carbon degenerately at its centre. This can lead to a thermonuclear runaway and thence a supernova explosion. However if the accretion rate is too high the outer layers of the white dwarf heat up too much and carbon ignites there non-degenerately. A series of mild carbon flashes can then propagate inwards and convert the carbon to neon relatively gently. There is no thermonuclear runaway and no supernova. We have determined the critical rate for accretion and find it to be generally about two-fifths of the Eddington rate. In the case of actual bianry stars the mass transfer rate falls off as mass is transferred so we find that this rate can be very much exceeded at the onset of mass transfer. We determine combinations of white dwarf masses that can lead to central degenerate carbon ignition.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.